Silvio Levy
2005-03-08 01:05:08 UTC
Dear Ralf - as you may have suspected, ANY M-x customize-* failed
for me (not just AUCTeX related ones); I just had never noticed it.
(I'm accustomed to editing .emacs directly.)
So the problem turned out to be this: in the command
(setq keyboard-translate-table "....") in my .emacs,
there was a naked control-M (instead of \C-M). This never caused
trouble with other aspects of emacs, but apparently it ruins the
customization mechanism.
Thank you very much for your help. If I may make a suggestion,
you-all might think of including in the AUCTeX doc a list of the
variables involved in syntax highlighting and an example of their
direct use. Putting such a line such as
'(font-latex-match-reference-keywords (quote ("fullref")))
(which is what I wanted to do from the beginning)
is a lot quicker than going though the customization menus, especially
if one wants to make the change on two or more systems.
Thanks again, and best wishes,
Silvio
for me (not just AUCTeX related ones); I just had never noticed it.
(I'm accustomed to editing .emacs directly.)
So the problem turned out to be this: in the command
(setq keyboard-translate-table "....") in my .emacs,
there was a naked control-M (instead of \C-M). This never caused
trouble with other aspects of emacs, but apparently it ruins the
customization mechanism.
Thank you very much for your help. If I may make a suggestion,
you-all might think of including in the AUCTeX doc a list of the
variables involved in syntax highlighting and an example of their
direct use. Putting such a line such as
'(font-latex-match-reference-keywords (quote ("fullref")))
(which is what I wanted to do from the beginning)
is a lot quicker than going though the customization menus, especially
if one wants to make the change on two or more systems.
Thanks again, and best wishes,
Silvio